What makes the government of saudi arabia non democratic
Authorities continue to arrest and imprison Saudi citizens merely for criticizing the government or participating in peaceful protests. Nearly all members of the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association have been imprisoned for their pro-rights advocacy, according to Human Rights Watch.
There is little doubt that corruption in Saudi Arabia is a significant impediment to economic reform. Steps by the government to root it out would undoubtedly improve the business climate and attract greater foreign and domestic investment.
Instead of building systems to stem corruption through a strong legal framework and judicial review, thus building confidence in the rule of law, the state chose to shake down the accused in an opaque process without ever being called on to prove the charges in court.
By arguing that the action was justified by a sense of urgency preventing the use of more formal legal channels, the government lost an opportunity to build the kind of framework that will benefit Saudi society over the long term.
For generations, the theory of governance in Saudi Arabia was that the population would accept the absolute rule of the Al Saud family in return for prosperity and stability. Accommodating the demand of young Saudis for loosened societal controls will undoubtedly reduce pressure on the ruling family to allow for a greater popular voice in fundamental government decisions.
But will that trade-off be enough? Saudi Arabia has been a pillar of U. Trump highlighted the broad scope of U. Moreover, the administration will look to Riyadh to assist in the reconstruction of Iraq and Yemen, the stabilization of Syria and efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For all these reasons the United States, which is counting heavily on Saudi support, has every reason to welcome the Vision initiative and to contribute to its success.
In particular, the U. Toward that end, Washington should do all it can to ensure that Saudi society has safe channels for airing dissent. It should also make the case to the Saudi leadership that its willingness to accept divergent views is an important component of our engagement. For as the experience of the Arab Spring suggests, when authoritarian regimes actively suppress dissent, the result is often an unhealthy build-up of pressures that leads to an unmanageable explosion of anger and frustration.
As MBS and the Saudi leadership advance broad, sweeping changes in the fundamental fabric of their society, it becomes more important than ever that the population have access to acceptable, peaceful means to express its views on those proposals. Part of the U. Photo: Flickr. Blog - Latest News. Saudi Arabia This is a prominent example of one of the many non-democratic countries that lack basic human rights. The people of Saudi Arabia are denied any substantial voice as authorities systematically discriminate against women and religious minorities, and judicial punishments are unbelievably inhumane.
In alone, Saudi Arabia carried out executions, 63 for non-violent drug crimes, according to the Human Rights Watch. The government imposes harsh restrictions on freedom of information and movement by threatening the people with forced labor and public executions. A UN report documented extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortion and other sexual violence in North Korea. A very uncertain political and economic outlook and a business environment with many troublesome weaknesses can have a significant impact on corporate payment behavior.
Corporate default probability is high. Source: Coface Arab League. Thank you for submitting.
0コメント